
4-digit year prefix behaviour
You are correct that some problems in earlier or later version are not the
same, but some are.
I apologize for my ignorance in earlier versions, and although my posting
may have not been helpful to this particular problem, it may have helped
others with similar concerns.
Quote:
> > > I' ve found PDOX4 to be Y2K compliant, but..
> > I have done some date testing in Paradox 5 and this is what I've found.
> > Hope this help.
> Since his question was about pdoxdos, not pdoxwin, it really *doesn't*
help..
> and, just so you know, the rules, defaults, and problems of *other*
pdoxwin
> versions aren't the same as pdoxwin 5 either..
> --
> Steve Green
> Corel CTech - Paradox
> Diamond Software Group, Inc.
> Waldorf, Maryland USA
> http://www.diamondsg.com